Think about visual/textual relationships on webpages. Find an article related to your topic and critique the webpage for its content, its graphic layout, and its reliability. Do not use Wikipedia, a dictionary, an encyclopedia, or imdb.com. Is it an accurate depiction or can webpages be misleading? How do color, pictures, layout design, and text all work together to create an image about the topic you are dealing with? Post the webpage you are analyzing along with the journal entry. Also, consider how words and images differ rhetorically. Can we accomplish different rhetorical goals through the use of video, still images, audio, and words that we may not be able to accomplish by words alone? When is it appropriate to choose to use one medium over another? In other words, can an image do something rhetorically that a word cannot, and in what situations are words more appropriate than an image?
Due: Thursday, July 15 (I was late posting this so you get an extra day!)
http://www.kidcudi.com/news/
ReplyDeleteThe website I visited was all about Kid Cudi and his upcoming events as well as aspiring artists. The website had alot of videos that showed singers and rappers. The videos were very important because you would not of been able to see the artists and hear there songs which is very important. The website also had picutures that explained who kid Cudi is without using any words, which is very usefull. At the same time, some pictures need captions to be explained, and without them, I would of not known what was going on.Audio is also extremly important because its a music website and the idea is that you enjoy the artists music and buy there cds. The content of the site was all positive and geared towards Kid Cudis success. There was nothing explaining his arrests or showing a negative view.